DCP Harish catches lecturer who has supposedly raped and strangled his student. Lecturer says DCP made a mistake. Years later he returns and reopens the case and wins it - and puts the cop into a lot of trouble. Who wins in the end and who is wrong is the big question?
Now, for a rapist lecturer to make big money for his client as easily would mean he would also be living it up instead of making life miserable by fighting a DCP, living an ordinary life and going to to doing what he did was hard to digest. Also some of the relationships seemed too contrived- like the lecturer's family which ditches him and then accepts him as easily.
Anyway, it kept it going until the end though it didn't tie in so well as a whole. Oh, and the Garudan is a tribute to the eagle like Keral police which I am sure they are. That was nice.
No comments:
Post a Comment